Automatic Data Processing vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Automatic Data Processing is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| Automatic Data Processing | Canadian Pacific Kansas City | |
|---|---|---|
| $122 billion | $81.9 billion | |
| 20.1% | 27.5% | |
| +7.9% | +19.6% | |
| 27.7× | 28.2× | |
| 0.2 years | 2.8 years | |
| 44.4% | 7.4% | |
| 2.9% | 0.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Automatic Data Processing vs Cintas · Automatic Data Processing vs Eaton · Automatic Data Processing vs Fastenal · Automatic Data Processing vs General Electric · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Ametek · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Caterpillar · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs CSX · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Cintas

