Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable and grows faster. United Rentals is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 27.5% | 15.5% | |
| +19.6% | +13.5% | |
| 28.2× | 27.9× | |
| 2.8 years | 2.1 years | |
| 7.4% | 13.3% | |
| 0.7% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Automatic Data Processing · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Ametek · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Caterpillar · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs CSX · United Rentals vs Cintas · United Rentals vs Eaton · United Rentals vs Fastenal · United Rentals vs General Dynamics