Eaton vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Eaton has less debt. United Rentals is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Eaton | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $137 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 14.9% | 15.5% | |
| +9.0% | +13.5% | |
| 33.6× | 27.9× | |
| 1.6 years | 2.1 years | |
| 14.0% | 13.3% | |
| 1.1% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Eaton vs Automatic Data Processing · Eaton vs Ametek · Eaton vs Caterpillar · Eaton vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs Fastenal · United Rentals vs General Dynamics · United Rentals vs W.W. Grainger · United Rentals vs Honeywell International