Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Union Pacific stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City grows faster. Union Pacific is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | Union Pacific | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $180 billion | |
| 27.5% | 29.1% | |
| +19.6% | +4.6% | |
| 28.2× | 25.2× | |
| 2.8 years | 2.4 years | |
| 7.4% | 16.5% | |
| 0.7% | 2.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs United Parcel Service · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs United Rentals · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Automatic Data Processing · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Ametek · Union Pacific vs CSX · Union Pacific vs Cintas · Union Pacific vs Fastenal · Union Pacific vs RELX

