Automatic Data Processing vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Automatic Data Processing is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. United Rentals grows faster.
Side by side
| Automatic Data Processing | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $122 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 20.1% | 15.5% | |
| +7.9% | +13.5% | |
| 27.7× | 27.9× | |
| 0.2 years | 2.1 years | |
| 44.4% | 13.3% | |
| 2.9% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Automatic Data Processing vs Workday · Automatic Data Processing vs Ametek · Automatic Data Processing vs Caterpillar · Automatic Data Processing vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs Ametek · United Rentals vs Caterpillar · United Rentals vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs Cintas

