Caterpillar vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
United Rentals is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Caterpillar | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $275 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 13.1% | 15.5% | |
| +10.1% | +13.5% | |
| 30.9× | 27.9× | |
| 2.3 years | 2.1 years | |
| 15.1% | 13.3% | |
| 0.7% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Caterpillar vs Vertiv · Caterpillar vs Waste Management · Caterpillar vs Automatic Data Processing · Caterpillar vs Ametek · United Rentals vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs Cintas · United Rentals vs Eaton · United Rentals vs Fastenal