Ametek vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Ametek is more profitable and has less debt. United Rentals grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Ametek | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $55.5 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 20.0% | 15.5% | |
| +10.3% | +13.5% | |
| 37.5× | 27.9× | |
| 0.8 years | 2.1 years | |
| 11.7% | 13.3% | |
| 0.6% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Ametek vs Automatic Data Processing · Ametek vs Caterpillar · Ametek vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Ametek vs Cintas · United Rentals vs Caterpillar · United Rentals vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs Cintas · United Rentals vs Eaton

