United Parcel Service vs United Rentals stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
United Parcel Service is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. United Rentals is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| United Parcel Service | United Rentals | |
|---|---|---|
| $95.7 billion | $69.6 billion | |
| 6.3% | 15.5% | |
| +0.9% | +13.5% | |
| 17.2× | 27.9× | |
| 1.9 years | 2.1 years | |
| 14.8% | 13.3% | |
| 6.2% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: United Parcel Service vs Automatic Data Processing · United Parcel Service vs Ametek · United Parcel Service vs Caterpillar · United Parcel Service vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Rentals vs Automatic Data Processing · United Rentals vs Ametek · United Rentals vs Caterpillar · United Rentals vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City