Automatic Data Processing vs United Parcel Service stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Automatic Data Processing is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. United Parcel Service is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Automatic Data Processing | United Parcel Service | |
|---|---|---|
| $122 billion | $95.7 billion | |
| 20.1% | 6.3% | |
| +7.9% | +0.9% | |
| 27.7× | 17.2× | |
| 0.2 years | 1.9 years | |
| 44.4% | 14.8% | |
| 2.9% | 6.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Automatic Data Processing vs United Rentals · Automatic Data Processing vs Workday · Automatic Data Processing vs Ametek · Automatic Data Processing vs Caterpillar · United Parcel Service vs Ametek · United Parcel Service vs Caterpillar · United Parcel Service vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · United Parcel Service vs Cintas

