The Goldman Sachs Group vs Interactive Brokers Group stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
The Goldman Sachs Group is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Interactive Brokers Group grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| The Goldman Sachs Group | Interactive Brokers Group | |
|---|---|---|
| $264 billion | $139 billion | |
| 29.5% | 9.6% | |
| +5.5% | +34.6% | |
| 15.4× | 141.6× | |
| 29.8 years | Net cash | |
| 0.9% | 135.3% | |
| 1.5% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: The Goldman Sachs Group vs Morgan Stanley · The Goldman Sachs Group vs BlackRock · Interactive Brokers Group vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Interactive Brokers Group vs Mastercard · Interactive Brokers Group vs Moody's · Interactive Brokers Group vs Morgan Stanley