Interactive Brokers Group vs Morgan Stanley stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Interactive Brokers Group grows faster and has less debt. Morgan Stanley is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Interactive Brokers Group | Morgan Stanley | |
|---|---|---|
| $139 billion | $298 billion | |
| 9.6% | 25.6% | |
| +34.6% | +9.5% | |
| 141.6× | 17.7× | |
| Net cash | 9.6 years | |
| 135.3% | 1.9% | |
| 0.4% | 2.0% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Interactive Brokers Group vs S&P Global · Interactive Brokers Group vs Visa · Interactive Brokers Group vs The Goldman Sachs Group · Interactive Brokers Group vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Morgan Stanley vs Mastercard · Morgan Stanley vs Moody's · Morgan Stanley vs S&P Global · Morgan Stanley vs Visa

