Which is more profitable, Morgan Stanley or S&P Global?

S&P Global keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Morgan Stanley or S&P Global?

S&P Global grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Morgan Stanley or S&P Global?

Morgan Stanley costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Morgan Stanley or S&P Global?

S&P Global would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Morgan StanleyMSvs

S&P GlobalSPGI

Morgan Stanley vs S&P Global stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Morgan Stanley is cheaper for its profits. S&P Global is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Morgan Stanley	S&P Global
	$298 billion	$137 billion
	25.6%	29.2%
	+9.5%	+15.6%
	17.7×	30.7×
	9.6 years	1.5 years
	1.9%	11.8%
	2.0%	0.9%

Open Morgan Stanley Open S&P Global

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Morgan Stanley vs Visa · Morgan Stanley vs BlackRock · Morgan Stanley vs The Goldman Sachs Group · Morgan Stanley vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · S&P Global vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group · S&P Global vs Nasdaq · S&P Global vs Nu Holdings · S&P Global vs NatWest Group