W.W. Grainger vs United Parcel Service stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
W.W. Grainger is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. United Parcel Service is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| W.W. Grainger | United Parcel Service | |
|---|---|---|
| $69.7 billion | $95.7 billion | |
| 9.5% | 6.3% | |
| +8.7% | +0.9% | |
| 40.9× | 17.2× | |
| 0.8 years | 1.9 years | |
| 30.8% | 14.8% | |
| 0.7% | 6.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: W.W. Grainger vs United Rentals · W.W. Grainger vs Vertiv · W.W. Grainger vs Automatic Data Processing · W.W. Grainger vs Ametek · United Parcel Service vs Honeywell International · United Parcel Service vs Howmet Aerospace · United Parcel Service vs Lockheed Martin · United Parcel Service vs RELX

