Halliburton vs SLB stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Halliburton grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. SLB is more profitable and has less debt.
Side by side
| Halliburton | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
| $27.9 billion | $76.3 billion | |
| 5.8% | 9.4% | |
| +9.0% | +8.6% | |
| 21.8× | 22.6× | |
| 1.6 years | 1.2 years | |
| 9.6% | 10.4% | |
| 1.7% | 2.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: SLB vs Exxon Mobil · SLB vs Chevron · SLB vs EOG Resources

