SLB vs Exxon Mobil stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
SLB is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Exxon Mobil has less debt.
Side by side
| SLB | Exxon Mobil | |
|---|---|---|
| $76.3 billion | $696 billion | |
| 9.4% | 8.9% | |
| +8.6% | −6.7% | |
| 22.6× | 24.1× | |
| 1.2 years | 0.5 years | |
| 10.4% | 13.1% | |
| 2.1% | 2.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: SLB vs Chevron · SLB vs EOG Resources · SLB vs Halliburton · Exxon Mobil vs Targa Resources · Exxon Mobil vs TC Energy · Exxon Mobil vs TotalEnergies · Exxon Mobil vs Canadian Natural Resources

