Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs McDonald's stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings grows faster. McDonald's is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings | McDonald's | |
|---|---|---|
| $83.0 billion | $192 billion | |
| 12.1% | 31.9% | |
| +22.8% | +7.0% | |
| 57.0× | 22.4× | |
| 4.2 years | 3.7 years | |
| 28.3% | 19.1% | |
| 0.2% | 2.6% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs MercadoLibre · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Nike · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs O'Reilly Automotive · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs PDD Holdings · McDonald's vs Marriott International · McDonald's vs MercadoLibre · McDonald's vs Ferrari · McDonald's vs Hermès