Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Nike stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings is more profitable and grows faster. Nike is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings | Nike | |
|---|---|---|
| $83.0 billion | $56.4 billion | |
| 12.1% | 6.7% | |
| +22.8% | +0.8% | |
| 57.0× | 18.2× | |
| 4.2 years | 0.8 years | |
| 28.3% | 11.9% | |
| 0.2% | 3.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs O'Reilly Automotive · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs PDD Holdings · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Ferrari · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Royal Caribbean Cruises · Nike vs Marriott International · Nike vs MercadoLibre · Nike vs PDD Holdings · Nike vs Ferrari