Johnson & Johnson vs Merck KGaA stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Johnson & Johnson is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Merck KGaA is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Johnson & Johnson | Merck KGaA | |
|---|---|---|
| $688 billion | €65.0 billion | |
| 28.5% | 12.4% | |
| +2.7% | −1.7% | |
| 25.7× | 24.9× | |
| 0.7 years | 1.6 years | |
| 21.0% | 6.4% | |
| 2.3% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Johnson & Johnson vs Moderna · Johnson & Johnson vs Novo Nordisk · Johnson & Johnson vs Novartis · Johnson & Johnson vs Pfizer · Merck KGaA vs Eli Lilly · Merck KGaA vs Merck & · Merck KGaA vs Roche · Merck KGaA vs AbbVie

