Eli Lilly vs Merck KGaA stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Eli Lilly is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Merck KGaA is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Eli Lilly | Merck KGaA | |
|---|---|---|
| $1.29 trillion | €65.0 billion | |
| 31.7% | 12.4% | |
| +21.6% | −1.7% | |
| 62.3× | 24.9× | |
| 1.1 years | 1.6 years | |
| 34.8% | 6.4% | |
| 0.6% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Eli Lilly vs Moderna · Eli Lilly vs Natera · Eli Lilly vs Novo Nordisk · Eli Lilly vs Novartis · Merck KGaA vs Merck & · Merck KGaA vs Roche · Merck KGaA vs AbbVie · Merck KGaA vs Johnson & Johnson

