Which is more profitable, KLA or Seagate Technology Holdings?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, KLA or Seagate Technology Holdings?

KLA grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, KLA or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Seagate Technology Holdings costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, KLA or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Seagate Technology Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

KLAKLACvs

Seagate Technology HoldingsSTX

KLA vs Seagate Technology Holdings stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

KLA is more profitable and grows faster. Seagate Technology Holdings is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	KLA	Seagate Technology Holdings
	$198 billion	$121 billion
	35.6%	26.1%
	+14.4%	+2.7%
	41.1×	38.1×
	0.7 years	0.4 years
	38.2%	53.4%
	0.4%	0.3%

Open KLA Open Seagate Technology Holdings

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: KLA vs TE Connectivity · KLA vs TSMC · KLA vs Texas Instruments · KLA vs Uber · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Lam Research · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Microsoft · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Nvidia · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Sandisk