Lam Research vs Snowflake stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Lam Research is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Snowflake grows faster.
Side by side
| Lam Research | Snowflake | |
|---|---|---|
| $282 billion | $103 billion | |
| 31.3% | -28.4% | |
| +9.7% | +51.2% | |
| 38.8× | No profit yet | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 42.1% | -22.6% | |
| 0.3% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Lam Research vs Synopsys · Lam Research vs Sony · Lam Research vs Seagate Technology Holdings · Lam Research vs TE Connectivity · Snowflake vs Microsoft · Snowflake vs Nvidia · Snowflake vs Palo Alto Networks · Snowflake vs TSMC