Mastercard vs MetLife stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Mastercard is more profitable and grows faster. MetLife is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Mastercard | MetLife | |
|---|---|---|
| $576 billion | $64.5 billion | |
| 45.6% | 4.5% | |
| +16.5% | +2.2% | |
| 38.5× | 19.1× | |
| 0.4 years | Net cash | |
| 58.5% | 9.5% | |
| 0.7% | 2.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Mastercard vs Manulife Financial · Mastercard vs Marsh & McLennan Companies · Mastercard vs Morgan Stanley · Mastercard vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group · MetLife vs Moody's · MetLife vs Prudential Financial · MetLife vs Reinsurance Group of America · MetLife vs S&P Global

