Moody's vs Wells Fargo stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Moody's is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Wells Fargo is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Moody's | Wells Fargo | |
|---|---|---|
| $87.6 billion | $258 billion | |
| 31.9% | 25.5% | |
| +7.5% | +2.4% | |
| 35.6× | 12.1× | |
| 1.3 years | 8.7 years | |
| 24.2% | 3.1% | |
| 0.9% | 2.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Moody's vs Aflac · Moody's vs The Allstate · Moody's vs Aon · Moody's vs Apollo Global Management · Wells Fargo vs S&P Global · Wells Fargo vs Visa · Wells Fargo vs Bank of America · Wells Fargo vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2

