Monster Beverage vs PepsiCo stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Monster Beverage is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. PepsiCo is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Monster Beverage | PepsiCo | |
|---|---|---|
| $90.9 billion | $198 billion | |
| 23.0% | 8.8% | |
| +12.5% | +5.9% | |
| 47.7× | 24.1× | |
| Net cash | 2.6 years | |
| 23.7% | 13.1% | |
| – | 3.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Monster Beverage vs Procter & Gamble · Monster Beverage vs Philip Morris International · Monster Beverage vs Target · Monster Beverage vs Unilever · PepsiCo vs Altria Group · PepsiCo vs Procter & Gamble · PepsiCo vs Philip Morris International · PepsiCo vs Target

