Which is more profitable, Rolls-Royce Holdings or RTX?

Rolls-Royce Holdings keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Rolls-Royce Holdings or RTX?

Rolls-Royce Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Rolls-Royce Holdings or RTX?

Rolls-Royce Holdings costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Rolls-Royce Holdings or RTX?

Rolls-Royce Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Rolls-Royce HoldingsRR.Lvs

RTXRTX

Rolls-Royce Holdings vs RTX stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Rolls-Royce Holdings is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Rolls-Royce Holdings	RTX
	£111 billion	$268 billion
	27.5%	7.6%
	+16.2%	+9.4%
	18.9×	39.8×
	Net cash	2.1 years
	77.6%	8.2%
	0.8%	1.5%

Open Rolls-Royce Holdings Open RTX

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Rolls-Royce Holdings vs SpaceX · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs Caterpillar · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs Cintas · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs General Electric · RTX vs Siemens · RTX vs SpaceX · RTX vs TransDigm Group · RTX vs Trane Technologies