Rolls-Royce Holdings vs SpaceX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Rolls-Royce Holdings is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. SpaceX grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Rolls-Royce Holdings | SpaceX | |
|---|---|---|
| £111 billion | $1.89 trillion | |
| 27.5% | -26.4% | |
| +16.2% | +34.1% | |
| 18.9× | No profit yet | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 77.6% | -2.8% | |
| 0.8% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Rolls-Royce Holdings vs Caterpillar · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs Cintas · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs General Electric · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs GE Aerospace · SpaceX vs RTX · SpaceX vs Safran SA · SpaceX vs Siemens · SpaceX vs Schneider Electric S.E.