Which is more profitable, GE Aerospace or Rolls-Royce Holdings?

Rolls-Royce Holdings keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, GE Aerospace or Rolls-Royce Holdings?

Rolls-Royce Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, GE Aerospace or Rolls-Royce Holdings?

Rolls-Royce Holdings costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, GE Aerospace or Rolls-Royce Holdings?

Rolls-Royce Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

GE AerospaceGEvs

Rolls-Royce HoldingsRR.L

GE Aerospace vs Rolls-Royce Holdings stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Rolls-Royce Holdings is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	GE Aerospace	Rolls-Royce Holdings
	$343 billion	£111 billion
	19.0%	27.5%
	−9.6%	+16.2%
	39.4×	18.9×
	0.7 years	Net cash
	22.4%	77.6%
	0.5%	0.8%

Open GE Aerospace Open Rolls-Royce Holdings

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: GE Aerospace vs RTX · GE Aerospace vs Safran SA · GE Aerospace vs Siemens · GE Aerospace vs SpaceX · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs RTX · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs SpaceX · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs Caterpillar · Rolls-Royce Holdings vs Cintas