Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. S&P Global is more profitable.
Side by side
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $156 billion | $137 billion | |
| 27.3% | 29.2% | |
| +15.9% | +15.6% | |
| 15.8× | 30.7× | |
| Net cash | 1.5 years | |
| 0.5% | 11.8% | |
| 2.2% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group vs Visa · Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group vs Mastercard · Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group vs Moody's · S&P Global vs The Toronto-Dominion Bank · S&P Global vs Truist Financial · S&P Global vs The Travelers Companies · S&P Global vs UBS Group