Sandisk vs Western Digital stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Sandisk grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Western Digital is more profitable.
Side by side
| Sandisk | Western Digital | |
|---|---|---|
| $126 billion | $111 billion | |
| 56.5% | 72.9% | |
| +49.3% | −5.3% | |
| 11.0× | 11.7× | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 66.6% | 82.3% | |
| – | 0.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Sandisk vs Apple · Sandisk vs Adobe · Sandisk vs Applied Materials · Sandisk vs Arista Networks · Western Digital vs Seagate Technology Holdings · Western Digital vs TSMC · Western Digital vs Apple · Western Digital vs Adobe

