NYT
¿Es The New York Times Company (NYT) una buena acción según Buffett?
The New York Times Company (NYT) is analysed against the documented Warren Buffett framework on this page. The Buffett-Fit score grades the stock A+ to D across five pillars (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation), each on a 0-100 sub-scale. The full reasoning behind every pillar is below. Educational only, not investment advice.
Five pillars at a glance. The New York Times Company's Buffett-Fit score weighs ROIC sustainability (currently 0.2%), gross-margin durability (0.5%), net-debt-to-EBITDA (-0.32x), free-cash-flow conversion (1.60x net income), and the owner-earnings yield (4.6%). Each pillar is scored 0-100 against sector-relative benchmarks.
Where NYT passes the test. A Buffett-style holding needs durable returns, conservative debt, owner-friendly management, and a price below intrinsic value. The full pillar breakdown on /buffett/nyt/ shows where The New York Times Company clears each bar - and where it doesn't.
What the score does NOT say. A high Buffett-Fit grade is a pattern-match against documented criteria, not a forecast. A stock graded A+ today can underperform if its underlying business deteriorates faster than the score updates. A D-graded stock can outperform if it's a value trap that recovers. The score weighs current fundamentals against a documented framework - that's all it claims to do.
How invest-like measures this
El marco Buffett-Fit en invest-like.com califica cualquier acción cotizada de A+ a D en una escala de 0 a 100 según cinco pilares ponderados: moat económico (ventaja competitiva duradera), durabilidad de los beneficios (rentabilidad consistente), calidad de la gestión (asignación de capital), salud financiera (balance conservador) y valoración (margen de seguridad).
Cada pilar se evalúa en la misma subescala de 0 a 100 según la rúbrica que Warren Buffett ha documentado en más de 50 años de cartas a accionistas de Berkshire Hathaway. La nota global es la media ponderada. Solo educativo - pattern-match contra criterios públicos documentados, no asesoramiento de inversión personalizado.
More questions about NYT
Dive deeper into NYT
Relacionado en invest-like
Análisis con el marco, con fines educativos. No es asesoramiento de inversión, ni una recomendación, ni está adaptado a tu situación personal. Haz siempre tu propia investigación.