Comparison · 2026

invest-like vs Ziggma

Pricing, features, coverage, and a clear answer on which one to choose. Written by someone who's actually used both, and is on the invest-like team. We don't pretend to be neutral; we tell you where Ziggma still wins and where invest-like is the better pick.

Last reviewed: May 16, 2026

Quick verdict

Ziggma is a portfolio-tracking and analytics platform with a proprietary stock-scoring algorithm aimed at the european retail market. invest-like is a verdict-first tool that scores every stock against seven named investor frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) and ships AI-generated 5-pillar Buffett verdicts with the reasoning written out. For most retail and serious-amateur value investors, invest-like is the sharper tool: the places where Ziggma still wins are listed below.

Track record

invest-like is the only tool here that publishes its verdict accuracy. The 7-framework consensus screen is +73.8% vs the S&P 500 over five years, every pick logged in public, with the entry timestamps locked.

See the published track record

Feature comparison

Investor frameworks

invest-like

7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)

Ziggma

Proprietary scoring

AI verdict per stock

invest-like

Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning

Ziggma

No structured AI verdict

LLM chat / Q&A

invest-like

Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)

Ziggma

None

Multi-investor debate

invest-like

Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate

Ziggma

None

Stock universe

invest-like

21,000+ US-focused

Ziggma

Major US and European-listed stocks

Cheapest paid tier

invest-like

€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)

Ziggma

Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo

Lifetime option

invest-like

€399 one-time (Founders)

Ziggma

No lifetime tier

Multi-language UI

invest-like

EN, DE, FR, ES, PT

Ziggma

English-only (typically)

Open verdict cache

invest-like

Yes: every prompt versioned

Ziggma

Proprietary / opaque

Feature	invest-like	Ziggma
Investor frameworks	7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)	Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock	Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning	No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A	Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)	None
Multi-investor debate	Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate	None
Stock universe	21,000+ US-focused	Major US and European-listed stocks
Cheapest paid tier	€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)	Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo
Lifetime option	€399 one-time (Founders)	No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI	EN, DE, FR, ES, PT	English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache	Yes: every prompt versioned	Proprietary / opaque

Pick Ziggma if…

Your portfolio is European-focused and Ziggma's regional coverage matters.
Portfolio risk + exposure analytics are your primary need.

Pick invest-like if…

You want named-investor framework grounding, not a proprietary score.
You want AI-grounded analysis (Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom).
You need halal screening.
You want a methodology you can audit and cite.

What Ziggma does well

Strong portfolio analytics with risk and exposure breakdowns.
European market coverage edges US-focused competitors.
Clean mobile experience.

Where invest-like is stronger

Seven explicit named investor frameworks per stock vs Ziggma's proprietary opaque score.
Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict with written reasoning, Ziggma's score is a number without per-pillar reasoning shown.
Ask Buffett RAG + Boardroom, no equivalent.
Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21), no halal screen.
Published 5-year backtest with locked entry timestamps, Ziggma does not publish backtest of its scoring algorithm.
Working papers backing the methodology, Ziggma does not publish a methodology document.

What Ziggma users actually complain about

Recurring patterns from public reviews on Reddit, Trustpilot, G2, and AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Paraphrased, not direct quotes.

Proprietary scoring methodology not fully documented, users can't audit the formula.
Coverage outside large-cap European and US-listed names is thin.
Mobile app polish exceeds the desktop experience.

We list these because we built invest-like to avoid each one: structured per-investor verdicts (no opaque scoring), Buffett Brain narrative reasoning (no buried conclusions), published methodology, and pricing for individuals not institutions.

Frequently asked questions

Is invest-like a Ziggma alternative?+

For stock-pick research, yes. Ziggma surfaces a proprietary score per stock plus portfolio analytics; invest-like scores every stock against seven named investor frameworks with written reasoning. For users who want transparent methodology over a proprietary black-box score, invest-like is the alternative.

Is Ziggma's score worth trusting?+

It's a proprietary aggregate that combines value, growth, dividend, momentum, and quality factors. The methodology isn't fully documented publicly so users have to accept the score on the brand's authority. invest-like publishes the rubric, the deal-breaker caps, and the per-pillar reasoning so any score is traceable.

Does Ziggma have AI features?+

No structured LLM-grounded verdict per stock. invest-like ships Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, and Boardroom.

How does pricing compare?+

Ziggma Premium is ~$9/mo. invest-like Pro is EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual equivalent). Comparable at entry.

Try invest-like in under 30 seconds

See the Buffett verdict on Apple, NVIDIA, or any of 21,000+ stocks.

See the Apple verdict Browse the 7 frameworks

Other comparisons

invest-like vs

Simply Wall St