Pricing, features, coverage, and a clear answer on which one to choose. Written by someone who's actually used both - and is on the invest-like team. We don't pretend to be neutral; we tell you where Ziggma still wins and where invest-like is the better pick.
Last reviewed:
Ziggma is a portfolio-tracking and analytics platform with a proprietary stock-scoring algorithm aimed at the european retail market. invest-like is a verdict-first tool that scores every stock against seven named investor frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) and ships AI-generated 5-pillar Buffett verdicts with the reasoning written out. For most retail and serious-amateur value investors, invest-like is the sharper tool - the only places Ziggma still wins are listed honestly below.
| Feature | invest-like | Ziggma |
|---|---|---|
| Investor frameworks | 7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) | Proprietary scoring |
| AI verdict per stock | Buffett Brain - 5-pillar verdict with reasoning | No structured AI verdict |
| LLM chat / Q&A | Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters) | None |
| Multi-investor debate | Boardroom - 4 legendary investors debate | None |
| Stock universe | 12,000+ US-focused | Major US and European-listed stocks |
| Cheapest paid tier | €12/mo equivalent (€144/yr) | Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo |
| Lifetime option | €299 one-time (Founders) | No lifetime tier |
| Multi-language UI | EN, DE, FR, ES, PT | English-only (typically) |
| Open verdict cache | Yes - every prompt versioned | Proprietary / opaque |
Recurring patterns from public reviews on Reddit, Trustpilot, G2, and AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Paraphrased, not direct quotes.
We list these honestly because we built invest-like specifically to avoid each one: structured per-investor verdicts (no opaque scoring), Buffett Brain narrative reasoning (no buried conclusions), published methodology, and pricing for individuals not institutions.
For stock-pick research, yes. Ziggma surfaces a proprietary score per stock plus portfolio analytics; invest-like grades every stock against seven named investor frameworks with written reasoning. For users who want transparent methodology over a proprietary black-box score, invest-like is the alternative.
It's a proprietary aggregate that combines value, growth, dividend, momentum, and quality factors. The methodology isn't fully documented publicly so users have to accept the score on the brand's authority. invest-like publishes the rubric, the deal-breaker caps, and the per-pillar reasoning so any score is traceable.
No structured LLM-grounded verdict per stock. invest-like ships Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, and Boardroom.
Ziggma Premium is ~$9/mo. invest-like Pro is EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual equivalent). Comparable at entry; invest-like adds the lifetime EUR 399 tier Ziggma doesn't ship.
See the Buffett verdict on Apple, NVIDIA, or any of 12,000+ stocks.
invest-like vs
Simply Wall St
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Stock Unlock
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
TIKR
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
GuruFocus
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
AlphaPicks
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Composer
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Finbox
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Magnifi
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
YCharts
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Zacks
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Morningstar
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Motley Fool
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Value Line
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Seeking Alpha
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Koyfin
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Stock Rover
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
FinChat
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
StockAnalysis.com
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Atom Finance
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Portfolio Visualizer
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Wisesheets
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
SimplyETF
Read comparisoninvest-like vs
Public.com
Read comparison