Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or CrowdStrike Holdings?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or CrowdStrike Holdings?

CrowdStrike Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or CrowdStrike Holdings?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or CrowdStrike Holdings?

CrowdStrike Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

CrowdStrike HoldingsCRWD

Applied Materials vs CrowdStrike Holdings stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. CrowdStrike Holdings grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	CrowdStrike Holdings
	$294 billion	$232 billion
	24.7%	-3.4%
	+10.5%	+40.6%
	42.0×	No profit yet
	Net cash	Net cash
	28.1%	-1.5%
	0.4%	–

Open Applied Materials Open CrowdStrike Holdings

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Cisco · Applied Materials vs Datadog · Applied Materials vs Fortinet · Applied Materials vs Corning · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Broadcom · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Fortinet · CrowdStrike Holdings vs KLA · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Lam Research