Which is more profitable, CrowdStrike Holdings or KLA?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, CrowdStrike Holdings or KLA?

CrowdStrike Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, CrowdStrike Holdings or KLA?

KLA costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, CrowdStrike Holdings or KLA?

CrowdStrike Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

CrowdStrike HoldingsCRWDvs

KLAKLAC

CrowdStrike Holdings vs KLA stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

CrowdStrike Holdings grows faster and has less debt. KLA is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	CrowdStrike Holdings	KLA
	$232 billion	$198 billion
	-3.4%	35.6%
	+40.6%	+14.4%
	No profit yet	41.1×
	Net cash	0.7 years
	-1.5%	38.2%
	–	0.4%

Open CrowdStrike Holdings Open KLA

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: CrowdStrike Holdings vs Lam Research · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Microsoft · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Nvidia · CrowdStrike Holdings vs TSMC · KLA vs Cisco · KLA vs Datadog · KLA vs Fortinet · KLA vs Corning