Which is more profitable, Booking Holdings or Nike?

Booking Holdings keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Booking Holdings or Nike?

Booking Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Booking Holdings or Nike?

Nike costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Booking Holdings or Nike?

Booking Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Booking HoldingsBKNGvs

NikeNKE

Booking Holdings vs Nike stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Booking Holdings is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Nike is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Booking Holdings	Nike
	$119 billion	$56.4 billion
	20.1%	6.7%
	+31.7%	+0.8%
	22.0×	18.2×
	0.2 years	0.8 years
	49.9%	11.9%
	0.9%	3.9%

Open Booking Holdings Open Nike

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Booking Holdings vs O'Reilly Automotive · Booking Holdings vs PDD Holdings · Booking Holdings vs Ferrari · Booking Holdings vs Royal Caribbean Cruises · Nike vs Carvana · Nike vs Home Depot · Nike vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings · Nike vs Marriott International