Which is more profitable, Cadence Design Systems or Corning?

Cadence Design Systems keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Cadence Design Systems or Corning?

Cadence Design Systems grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Cadence Design Systems or Corning?

Corning costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Cadence Design Systems or Corning?

Cadence Design Systems would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Cadence Design SystemsCDNSvs

CorningGLW

Cadence Design Systems vs Corning stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Cadence Design Systems is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Corning is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Cadence Design Systems	Corning
	$88.6 billion	$98.3 billion
	20.9%	10.2%
	+14.6%	+6.7%
	79.9×	61.6×
	Net cash	2.1 years
	16.4%	9.1%
	–	0.6%

Open Cadence Design Systems Open Corning

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Cadence Design Systems vs IBM · Cadence Design Systems vs Intel · Cadence Design Systems vs Intuit · Cadence Design Systems vs KLA · Corning vs Fortinet · Corning vs Intuit · Corning vs KLA · Corning vs Lam Research