Which is more profitable, Canadian Natural Resources or ConocoPhillips?

Canadian Natural Resources keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Canadian Natural Resources or ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Canadian Natural Resources or ConocoPhillips?

Canadian Natural Resources costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Canadian Natural Resources or ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Canadian Natural ResourcesCNQvs

ConocoPhillipsCOP

Canadian Natural Resources vs ConocoPhillips stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Canadian Natural Resources is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. ConocoPhillips grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Canadian Natural Resources	ConocoPhillips
	$101 billion	$168 billion
	24.5%	13.6%
	−3.7%	+25.7%
	13.4×	21.1×
	0.7 years	0.7 years
	19.0%	12.8%
	3.4%	2.9%

Open Canadian Natural Resources Open ConocoPhillips

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Canadian Natural Resources vs Chevron · Canadian Natural Resources vs Enbridge · Canadian Natural Resources vs EOG Resources · Canadian Natural Resources vs Enterprise Products Partners L.P. · ConocoPhillips vs Chevron · ConocoPhillips vs Enbridge · ConocoPhillips vs EOG Resources · ConocoPhillips vs Diamondback Energy