Which is more profitable, ConocoPhillips or Diamondback Energy?

ConocoPhillips keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, ConocoPhillips or Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, ConocoPhillips or Diamondback Energy?

ConocoPhillips costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, ConocoPhillips or Diamondback Energy?

ConocoPhillips would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

ConocoPhillipsCOPvs

Diamondback EnergyFANG

ConocoPhillips vs Diamondback Energy stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

ConocoPhillips is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Diamondback Energy grows faster.

Side by side

	ConocoPhillips	Diamondback Energy
	$168 billion	$51.6 billion
	13.6%	11.1%
	+25.7%	+39.6%
	21.1×	31.0×
	0.7 years	2.1 years
	12.8%	3.3%
	2.9%	2.1%

Open ConocoPhillips Open Diamondback Energy

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: ConocoPhillips vs Cheniere Energy · ConocoPhillips vs MPLX LP · ConocoPhillips vs Shell · ConocoPhillips vs Targa Resources · Diamondback Energy vs Chevron · Diamondback Energy vs Enbridge · Diamondback Energy vs EOG Resources · Diamondback Energy vs MPLX LP