ConocoPhillips vs Shell stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ConocoPhillips is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Shell is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| ConocoPhillips | Shell | |
|---|---|---|
| $168 billion | $280 billion | |
| 13.6% | 6.7% | |
| +25.7% | −11.2% | |
| 21.1× | 15.7× | |
| 0.7 years | 0.8 years | |
| 12.8% | 11.2% | |
| 2.9% | 3.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ConocoPhillips vs Targa Resources · ConocoPhillips vs TotalEnergies · ConocoPhillips vs The Williams Companies · ConocoPhillips vs Exxon Mobil · Shell vs Chevron · Shell vs EOG Resources · Shell vs Exxon Mobil

