ConocoPhillips vs TotalEnergies stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ConocoPhillips is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. TotalEnergies is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| ConocoPhillips | TotalEnergies | |
|---|---|---|
| $168 billion | $199 billion | |
| 13.6% | 7.2% | |
| +25.7% | −11.5% | |
| 21.1× | 15.2× | |
| 0.7 years | 0.9 years | |
| 12.8% | 11.6% | |
| 2.9% | 4.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ConocoPhillips vs The Williams Companies · ConocoPhillips vs Exxon Mobil · ConocoPhillips vs Canadian Natural Resources · ConocoPhillips vs Chevron · TotalEnergies vs Enbridge · TotalEnergies vs EOG Resources · TotalEnergies vs Diamondback Energy · TotalEnergies vs Imperial Oil

