ConocoPhillips vs Exxon Mobil stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ConocoPhillips is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Exxon Mobil has less debt.
Side by side
| ConocoPhillips | Exxon Mobil | |
|---|---|---|
| $168 billion | $696 billion | |
| 13.6% | 8.9% | |
| +25.7% | −6.7% | |
| 21.1× | 24.1× | |
| 0.7 years | 0.5 years | |
| 12.8% | 13.1% | |
| 2.9% | 2.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ConocoPhillips vs Canadian Natural Resources · ConocoPhillips vs Chevron · ConocoPhillips vs Enbridge · ConocoPhillips vs EOG Resources · Exxon Mobil vs Chevron · Exxon Mobil vs Devon Energy · Exxon Mobil vs Enbridge · Exxon Mobil vs EOG Resources

