ConocoPhillips vs Chevron stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ConocoPhillips is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| ConocoPhillips | Chevron | |
|---|---|---|
| $168 billion | $429 billion | |
| 13.6% | 6.7% | |
| +25.7% | +14.3% | |
| 21.1× | 34.9× | |
| 0.7 years | 0.8 years | |
| 12.8% | 7.5% | |
| 2.9% | 3.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ConocoPhillips vs Enbridge · ConocoPhillips vs EOG Resources · ConocoPhillips vs Diamondback Energy · ConocoPhillips vs Cheniere Energy · Chevron vs Devon Energy · Chevron vs EOG Resources · Chevron vs Enterprise Products Partners L.P. · Chevron vs Energy Transfer LP

