Shell vs Exxon Mobil stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Shell is cheaper for its profits. Exxon Mobil is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Shell | Exxon Mobil | |
|---|---|---|
| $280 billion | $696 billion | |
| 6.7% | 8.9% | |
| −11.2% | −6.7% | |
| 15.7× | 24.1× | |
| 0.8 years | 0.5 years | |
| 11.2% | 13.1% | |
| 3.5% | 2.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Shell vs ConocoPhillips · Shell vs Chevron · Shell vs EOG Resources · Exxon Mobil vs SLB · Exxon Mobil vs Targa Resources · Exxon Mobil vs TC Energy · Exxon Mobil vs TotalEnergies

