Which is more profitable, ConocoPhillips or MPLX LP?

MPLX LP keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, ConocoPhillips or MPLX LP?

ConocoPhillips grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, ConocoPhillips or MPLX LP?

MPLX LP costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, ConocoPhillips or MPLX LP?

ConocoPhillips would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

ConocoPhillipsCOPvs

MPLX LPMPLX

ConocoPhillips vs MPLX LP stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

ConocoPhillips grows faster and has less debt. MPLX LP is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	ConocoPhillips	MPLX LP
	$168 billion	$58.0 billion
	13.6%	42.8%
	+25.7%	+2.9%
	21.1×	11.8×
	0.7 years	3.3 years
	12.8%	18.5%
	2.9%	7.5%

Open ConocoPhillips Open MPLX LP

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: ConocoPhillips vs Shell · ConocoPhillips vs Targa Resources · ConocoPhillips vs TotalEnergies · ConocoPhillips vs The Williams Companies · MPLX LP vs Chevron · MPLX LP vs Enbridge · MPLX LP vs EOG Resources · MPLX LP vs Enterprise Products Partners L.P.