Which is more profitable, Canadian Natural Resources or Diamondback Energy?

Canadian Natural Resources keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Canadian Natural Resources or Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Canadian Natural Resources or Diamondback Energy?

Canadian Natural Resources costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Canadian Natural Resources or Diamondback Energy?

Canadian Natural Resources would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Canadian Natural ResourcesCNQvs

Diamondback EnergyFANG

Canadian Natural Resources vs Diamondback Energy stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Canadian Natural Resources is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Diamondback Energy grows faster.

Side by side

	Canadian Natural Resources	Diamondback Energy
	$101 billion	$51.6 billion
	24.5%	11.1%
	−3.7%	+39.6%
	13.4×	31.0×
	0.7 years	2.1 years
	19.0%	3.3%
	3.4%	2.1%

Open Canadian Natural Resources Open Diamondback Energy

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Canadian Natural Resources vs Imperial Oil · Canadian Natural Resources vs Cheniere Energy · Canadian Natural Resources vs MPLX LP · Canadian Natural Resources vs ONEOK · Diamondback Energy vs ConocoPhillips · Diamondback Energy vs Chevron · Diamondback Energy vs Enbridge · Diamondback Energy vs EOG Resources