Fastenal vs Northrop Grumman stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Fastenal is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Northrop Grumman is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Fastenal | Northrop Grumman | |
|---|---|---|
| $63.3 billion | $78.2 billion | |
| 15.3% | 10.0% | |
| +7.7% | +2.7% | |
| 50.3× | 18.7× | |
| 0.1 years | 1.8 years | |
| 28.8% | 13.8% | |
| 2.1% | 1.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Fastenal vs Norfolk Southern · Fastenal vs Parker-Hannifin · Fastenal vs Quanta Services · Fastenal vs RELX · Northrop Grumman vs General Electric · Northrop Grumman vs GE Aerospace · Northrop Grumman vs Garmin · Northrop Grumman vs L3Harris Technologies

