L3Harris Technologies vs Northrop Grumman stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
L3Harris Technologies grows faster. Northrop Grumman is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| L3Harris Technologies | Northrop Grumman | |
|---|---|---|
| $50.7 billion | $78.2 billion | |
| 7.3% | 10.0% | |
| +3.7% | +2.7% | |
| 31.6× | 18.7× | |
| 2.7 years | 1.8 years | |
| 6.7% | 13.8% | |
| 1.6% | 1.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: L3Harris Technologies vs Garmin · Northrop Grumman vs RELX · Northrop Grumman vs RTX · Northrop Grumman vs SpaceX · Northrop Grumman vs Trane Technologies

