Northrop Grumman vs Trane Technologies stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Northrop Grumman is cheaper for its profits. Trane Technologies is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Northrop Grumman | Trane Technologies | |
|---|---|---|
| $78.2 billion | $91.5 billion | |
| 10.0% | 13.7% | |
| +2.7% | +11.4% | |
| 18.7× | 31.3× | |
| 1.8 years | 0.7 years | |
| 13.8% | 24.0% | |
| 1.7% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Northrop Grumman vs Caterpillar · Northrop Grumman vs Cintas · Northrop Grumman vs Fastenal · Northrop Grumman vs General Electric · Trane Technologies vs Norfolk Southern · Trane Technologies vs Parker-Hannifin · Trane Technologies vs Quanta Services · Trane Technologies vs RELX

