Norfolk Southern vs Trane Technologies stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Norfolk Southern is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Trane Technologies grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Norfolk Southern | Trane Technologies | |
|---|---|---|
| $73.6 billion | $91.5 billion | |
| 23.6% | 13.7% | |
| +4.5% | +11.4% | |
| 25.6× | 31.3× | |
| 2.7 years | 0.7 years | |
| 11.0% | 24.0% | |
| 1.8% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Norfolk Southern vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Norfolk Southern vs CSX · Norfolk Southern vs Cintas · Norfolk Southern vs Fastenal · Trane Technologies vs Parker-Hannifin · Trane Technologies vs Quanta Services · Trane Technologies vs RELX · Trane Technologies vs RTX

