Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Norfolk Southern stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable and grows faster. Norfolk Southern is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | Norfolk Southern | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $73.6 billion | |
| 27.5% | 23.6% | |
| +19.6% | +4.5% | |
| 28.2× | 25.6× | |
| 2.8 years | 2.7 years | |
| 7.4% | 11.0% | |
| 0.7% | 1.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Parker-Hannifin · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs RELX · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Trane Technologies · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Union Pacific · Norfolk Southern vs CSX · Norfolk Southern vs Cintas · Norfolk Southern vs Fastenal · Norfolk Southern vs RELX