Norfolk Southern vs RELX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Norfolk Southern is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. RELX has less debt.
Side by side
| Norfolk Southern | RELX | |
|---|---|---|
| $73.6 billion | $70.3 billion | |
| 23.6% | 21.5% | |
| +4.5% | +3.9% | |
| 25.6× | 25.8× | |
| 2.7 years | 2.1 years | |
| 11.0% | 22.0% | |
| 1.8% | 2.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Norfolk Southern vs Trane Technologies · Norfolk Southern vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Norfolk Southern vs CSX · Norfolk Southern vs Cintas · RELX vs Parker-Hannifin · RELX vs Quanta Services · RELX vs RTX · RELX vs SpaceX

